Once again, I am playing Devil's Advocate here.
The games yesterday aligned with 66 in relation to Thanksgiving.
Thanksgiving=66
Cincinnati=66
They beat the Ravens who fell to 6-6.
The Chiefs also lost and became 6-6.
Well, this is interesting, but if you look at the history of this happening on Thanksgiving, it loses just as much as it wins. So to make it seem as though this is some WINNING Code on Thanksgiving is wrong.
It also would've made the Packers 8-4 with a loss.
Green Bay Packers=84
The Cowboys also won making New York 2-10 instead of 3-9 and 3-3(away).
New York=39 and 33
The Bears and Cowboys both became 6-6 on this day.
But, if you keep going and look at the history of the 6-6 narrative being possible, it misses just as much.
In 2013, The Lions were 6-5 before the game and won instead of becoming 6-6.
The Cowboys were also 6-5 before the game, and they won instead of becoming 6-6.
The Ravens did become 6-6 that year, but whatever team won would become 6-6 in that game.
But, in 2002, the Patriots were 6-5 going into Thanksgiving and ended up winning to become 7-5, instead of 6-6.
The Redskins were also 5-6, and ended up losing to become 5-7 instead of 6-6.
ESPN.com won't let me go back any further than 2002, but I think you get the point. This is not a clear pattern to be betting on. It does seem interesting, but when it doesn't hit just as much as it does, it makes it seem more coincidental, and takes away the message that it's some Gematria RITUAL.
And sure, you can probably find other patterns outside of "Thanksgiving"=66...such as "Thursday"=35....but even that doesn't always hit. It also is never explained why it's synced to a Coaches record one time, and then the QB the next time and so on. It doesn't mean Sports aren't rigged, but I honestly think a lot of the Gematria connections with it aren't part of the rigging. I'm also not saying it can't be done, and isn't being done, but until someone can explain why the formula is always different, no one is going to take advantage of it without Luck being involved.


















No comments:
Post a Comment